Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2307/40313
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLiberati, Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorResce, Giuliano-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T09:11:54Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T09:11:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2307/40313-
dc.description.abstractConventional economic analyses refer to inequality in terms of distribution of income and wealth, but a significant part of inequality of opportunities is due to differences in non-market outcomes like education and health. Two main issues characterize the evaluation of these phenomena. Unlike the case of the commercial sector, there is no obvious criterion, like profitability, in the objective function of the suppliers. Moreover, non-market good and services are provided free of charge or at prices that are economically insignificant. This thesis, by means of three essays, contributes to the literature focused on equity and efficiency in sectors that are typically out of the market. The first two chapters are specifically dedicated to education and health care, and the third chapter is devoted to multidimensional well-being. Synthesis of quantitative measures of outcome without market prices is the key aspect of all the evaluations proposed here. The analysis on the Italian National Health Service shows that in the last two decades there has been no convergence path in terms of health care outcome, neither between nor within regions, regardless of the weights given to the different dimensions. The analysis on Education Systems finds a significant effect of the Economic Social and Cultural Status on student performances, with a strong heterogeneity among countries. The analysis on Better Life Index in OECD shows that the local societal preferences play a relevant role in the evaluation. As further research, this thesis proves that many problems related to multidimensional phenomena out of market can be studied with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Policy makers dealing with collective choices need tools to manage the multidimensionality of phenomena and the heterogeneity of individual preferences. The new tools proposed in this thesis combined with the new source of big data that are nowadays increasingly available, can certainly be a valid support for better-informed decisions and policy formulations. A holistic approach beyond market prices can help in understanding and managing the Market/Government relationships.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversità degli studi Roma Treen_US
dc.subjectEFFICIENCYen_US
dc.subjectEQUITYen_US
dc.subjectMARKET PRICESen_US
dc.subjectPUBLIC SECTORen_US
dc.titleBeyond Market Prices : Three Essays on Equity and Efficiency in Public Interventionen_US
dc.typeDoctoral Thesisen_US
dc.subject.miurSettori Disciplinari MIUR::Scienze economiche e statistiche::ECONOMIA POLITICAen_US
dc.subject.isicruiCategorie ISI-CRUI::Scienze economiche e statistiche::Economicsen_US
dc.subject.anagraferoma3Scienze economiche e statisticheen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.description.romatrecurrentDipartimento di Economia*
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Dipartimento di Economia
T - Tesi di dottorato
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Tesi Giuliano Resce.pdf4.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Recommend this item

Page view(s)

154
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Download(s)

240
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.